this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
3 points (63.6% liked)

jet's interesting finds

38 readers
4 users here now

my journal

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

great conversation about cardiovascular risk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’m required to click in order to find out any of the measures since they’re not in the title of the video or in the post description. Before watching, I have no idea whether they’ll be snake oil.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Clickbait implies a misleading, or incorrect title.

If you want a written resource, I'm sure you can find one.

I've curated what I put in the interesting area to be things I found interesting of high value.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Okay, I was a bit harsh, and “clickbait” is inaccurate. I’m sorry.

Still seems like the measures could be revealed in the title or post description.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

5:13 he gives the TL;DR - metabolic health. It wasn't even that far into the video my guy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Proposed new video title:
“How metabolic health can be measured at home to Predict a Heart Attack - Dr. Brewer”

That would be sufficient to know if the video is worth a click.

[–] L0rdMathias 1 points 1 week ago

5 minute is a long time. The effort I am willing to put into listening is proportional to the amount of care the creator took when editing to respecting the listener's time.

If someone approaches me in a way that signals they obviously and blatantly do not value my time, why would I give them any of it?