this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
230 points (97.9% liked)

Gaming

3792 readers
677 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otp 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's easy to play retro games now and gloss over the challenges. With old stuff, we often have the best of both worlds -- the challenges of the past can be overcome with modern features.

  • Save states help negate fake difficulty
  • Turbo/speedup and save editing help negate grinding, loading, and other time sinks
  • Digitization makes it easier to store and keep track of lots of game (no need to worry about someone losing a game you lent them!)
  • Modern storage capacities mean we can have as many save games as we want for free
  • Mods let us experience games (sometimes) even better than they were back in the day
  • Digital games are much more affordable now. Back in the day, if you wanted to play something other than your same handful of games, you'd have to borrow one from a friend, rent one, or pay at least 30 bucks or so for something that wasn't trash. Or you want a brand new game? Might set you back $200 (both adjusted for inflation).
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, the modern experience of retro games is super different in all sorts of ways.

All of that is 100% true. Conversely, a lot of stuff I was fine with in games at the time now seems unbearable. Old games that were great in context now aren't and games that nobody knew existed now hold up great and have become cult classics.

Which is why preservation isn't just about making the games playable, you also need some sort of record of how they were perceived at the time and why.

I'm overthinking some random meme about old game nostalgia, as usual, but none of this is wrong.