this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
734 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19675 readers
3665 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Department of Transportation (DOT) has issued a memo prioritizing federal funding for communities with marriage and birth rates above the national average.

The directive, which applies to grants, loans, and contracts, also prioritizes projects benefiting families with young children.

A congressional aide criticized the policy, saying, “Considering fertility rates when prioritizing federal grants? We obviously have no idea what the full impact of that will be… It’s absolutely creepy. It’s a little ‘Chinese government.’”

The memo also blocks mask mandates and requires compliance with immigration enforcement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes you do. You support him via advocating for a completely ass backwards promotion of third party voting.

If a third party is to be even remotely viable in FPTP, you don't fucking start with the presidency.

You can't magically drum up sufficient support for a candidate to win the fucking presidency with zero/near zero seats in congress or the senate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

"In Congress or the Senate"? Congress INCLUDES the Senate. Congress is the combination of the House and the Senate.

Yes you do. You support him via advocating for a completely ass backwards promotion of third party voting.

This is the most fucking backwards logic I've ever seen. I talk about "leftists want to make a better world" by using a completely different approach than voting for fascists. You frame the false choice of "anyone but fascists is impossible" again. And then by your logic, not supporting fascists is equal to supporting fascists, because "it's like voting for fascist B, because either fascist A or B has to win!" THIS LOGIC IS NOT SOUND.

If you can't actually add something that's not completely fucking insane to the conversation, then DO. NOT. REPLY.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If you want to get an actual left winger into office in the us you have exactly three options, entryism into the democrat party and pushing a left winger in the primaries (ie bernie, maybe AOC in the future), building up a new party starting by taking local offices in progressive places until the dems either have to pivot to the left or are replaced by you, revolution.

Ignoring reality and voting for a third party in the presidential election is nothing more than posturing at best and actively enabling the worst elements in society at worst.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

For the ten millionth time. The population has the option to vote for anyone. Preemptively narrowing the options down to two parties is self-defeating circular logic. I have addressed this exact point on this website about a thousand times already. Stop bringing it up. It is incorrect - misinformation/disinformation.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So why dont you just vote for yourself? Clearly thats the only way to agree with your candidate 100% and it clearly doesnt matter to you what the odds of winning are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 minutes ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago) (1 children)

Jesus fucking christ. It's like talking to a "hello world" program.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

Ah yes I'd forgotten about all those elections in a winner takes all system where a candidate was polling at 1% the day before election turned out to win it. Your obnoxious posting style really helped me remember that absolutely true fact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago) (1 children)

One day before? How about 12 months before? How about 4 years before? I've been hearing your lesser of two evils bullshit for 25 years. You locked yourselves in a prison and threw away the key. There is no escape for you all until you reject your own fucked up self-defeating mentality. Period. You will keep voting for mass murderers and they will keep tightening their grip until we're all dead. They just have to keep pantomining "big tough Muricans vs. opposition with a conscience" enough for you to buy it. And we're all stuck on the ship you decided to sink. We're truly fucked as a species because of the idiocy of people like you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago) (1 children)

So do what I literally said before, build up a party, take places that you have a realistic chance of winning, build your parties power base and then take larger constituencies. That's how a an organisation actually interested in political power would go about it with multiple years out. Not trying to jump to the highest level office in the land where the mathematical reality of the system insists that that one of the top two candidates will win.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago) (1 children)

Jesus fucking christ. YOU BUILD A PARTY UP BY VOTING FOR IT. PEOPLE EMPLOY THE SAME FUCKING "LESSER OF TWO EVILS" LOGIC FOR PEOPLE IN THE SENATE, AND HOUSE, AND GOVERNOR SEATS. EITHER THE POPULATION TAKES THE INITIATIVE TO ACTUALLY VOTE FOR PEOPLE WHO AREN'T MASS MURDERERS, OR MASS MURDERERS STAY IN POWER, PERIOD.

Stop messaging me. I'm seriously going to scream, you're so fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

If you dont understand the difference between trying to start by winning a mayoralty of a town of 10,000 people then some state legislature seat and trying to win the president of the USA without an existing power base I dont know what to tell you. I cant break that down to being any simpler for you as to why starting with the later before you've managed the former is pointless.