this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
23 points (96.0% liked)
Bicycles
3240 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to [email protected]
A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!
Community Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
-
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn.
-
No ads / spamming.
-
Ride bikes
Other cycling-related communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To comment on the bicycle itself, the 2 chain thing is cool. I don't exactly know how it works, but I have already seen retro-direct setups (1 chain + 2 freewheels, with-or-without a jockey wheel) and it is something that has interested me. The big difference here is that with retro-direct, you keep pedalling backwards for the other gear.
I imagine retro-direct could be done with 2 chains for the redundancy, perhaps even with different types of drives for each (like some cheap geared belt for the low gear, normal chain for high gear). Though this would be more suitable if swapping out gear combo was not too difficult, to adjust to rider fitness.
EDIT: I should say with chain vs belt I mean whichever gear you expect to require the most force which may in fact depend on cargo weight+hills. Though the chain being the smaller one might just be smart to reduce wear (esp. w/fully enclosed chain case, exposed belt).