politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Its crazy days right now and something crazy just occurred to me.
(conspiracy theory) We all know trump isn't smart enough to come up with any of this on his own and is just following instructions of people close to him who convince him that he's a big boy by putting all these tariffs in place. Is it possible his cronies are intentionally giving him bad advice putting all these tariffs in place alientating him from his opponents and allies alike so they can use the 25th Amendment to declare trump incompetent putting Vance in charge for 4 years? (/conspiracy theory)
It's far simpler that his handlers are foreign and actors who want the nation destroyed so they can chop it up and auction off the pieces. That motive fits.
His new inner circle are not his handlers; they are new recruits who want to be first in line to buy up the pieces. A billionaire is not a patriot. They don't give two fucks about society - that's why they're billionaires.
If that is true then aren't those foreign actors getting a serious case of "friendly fire" right now? Stalwart allies like Canada and Mexico are getting sanctions for no good reason. Historical economic and espionage foes like China are also getting additional sanctions this week, and Russia is getting its few remaining hydrocarbon delivery methods slapped down (shadow fleet bans and Ukraine turning off methane pipelines).
Wouldn't those groups be incentivize to a trump alternative?
How does any of this hurt Putin, though?
Trump is threatening more sanctions against Russia if it fails to negotiate on the war
Moscow's oil exports are under pressure as Western sanctions hit Russia's 'shadow fleet'
From your first link:
"As President Trump threatens new sanctions against Russia, the Russian economy thrives despite previous measures that failed to deliver the intended bite."
Meanwhile, we're discussing actions in this thread that will clearly have consequences, not empty threats.
You need to read more than the first line of an article, such as this:
"Defense and security will account for some 40% of all government spending this year - that's up a quarter - and an investment in guns that's so heavy, it's making a mess of the proverbial butter. Prices on basic food staples, such as real butter, are up, way up, so much so there's even been reports of supermarkets keeping it under lock and key. Inozemtsev says runaway inflation, as well as the tumbling value of Russia's currency, the ruble, and high interest rates - they're all indications that sanctions are working, just more slowly than anyone imagined."
To what end? If what you say is true they should have everything they want with Trump?
Two problems with trump from his handler's perspective.
I'm not seriously considering this is true, by the way. Its just a manufactured idea that could fit the puzzle we have today.