this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
435 points (98.2% liked)

NonCredibleDiplomacy

158 readers
1 users here now

Shitposting about geopolitics, diplomacy, and current events for shits and giggles

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
435
Tariffs (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/noncrediblediplomacy
 

(This is a parody for all who were unawere)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] piccolo 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So I Guess its better to vote for a dictatorship than trying to protect democracy for the future.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You wouldn’t be protecting democracy. You would be destroying it completely.

[–] piccolo 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No it would not. It would be a wake up call for the senate to pull back the power of POTUS if anything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, it would because you have a candidate going out of their way to prevent a fair election from happening.

This is intro level poli sci stuff that you are not getting here

[–] piccolo 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More like resetting the election forcing both parties to pick new candidates.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which we don't do either unless there is demonstrable proof that the election was fraudulent and we don't have.

You keep making the authoritarian/dictatorial choice that doesn't align with the rule of law. Why?

[–] piccolo 2 points 1 week ago

Because the "rule of law" failed and allowed authoritarian to take over.

Why is that so hard to understand?