this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
56 points (95.2% liked)
Privacy
544 readers
326 users here now
Protect your privacy in the digital world
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
~PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!~
- Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice
- No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned
- Stay on topic
- Don't promote proprietary software
- No crypto
- No Xitter links (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
- If you post news exclusive to a country please name it. ~(This isn't a bannable rule, just a recommendation!)~
Related communities
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Creator of crypt.fyi here! Thank you for pointing out the lack of clarity in the 'why' statement. It really should state that sensitive data is shared through insecure channels in plain text. The in plain text part is key, as it leaves the contents indefinitely vulnerable.
Peoples eyes have glazed over at the mere sound of the words 'asymmetric encryption'. It's a bit out of touch of a statement to make haha. I believe these individuals still deserve more accessible tools that make them incrementally more secure and maybe it can be a gateway to even more secure/private solutions.
The URL contains the decryption key, so how do you imagine users of crypt.fyi share a URL to their recipients?
It's expected to be shared via an otherwise insecure channel (email, SMS, etc.). That is where there is a large compromise on convenience. I have a feature that I want to implement that separates the key from the URL so the URL and key can be shared via separate channels https://github.com/osbytes/crypt.fyi/issues/54