this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
83 points (98.8% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2508 readers
1028 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Who's going to hold him accountable? These things are true:
If an individual or small group tries, they'll be arrested or killed by authorities.
A large enough group of people acting together could do it, but it has to be large enough, or see #1.
To build a large enough group requires getting the word out, and getting the word out means that the authorities will hear about it. See #1.
If the word goes out by anonymous, untraceable communication channels, then each person has to trust people they haven't met and don't know to act in concert with the plan. If the others fail to act, see #1.
I just realized that I've re-created the need for resistance networks (a web of trust in which each person only knows and trusts a small number of others each) from first principles. But even those require people willing to risk getting arrested or killed, because sometimes the authorities bust resistance cells. Basically, this is how all dictators hold on to power against overwhelming discontent in the populace: Nobody can get together in large enough numbers to do anything about it, and individually, going along with the regime is slightly (or a lot) better than not.
Dictators fall when enough of the population decides that the status quo is worse than defying the dictator. The United States is nowhere near that stage yet.