this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
151 points (96.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3718 readers
40 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are enough warheads on both sides that no "first strike" could get all or even most. It's lose/lose any time.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Look, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just watched the British film 'Threads' about a nuclear exchange. Idk, how much nuclear winter will we need to counteract the global heating over the last 50 years?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Nuclear winter doesnt exist so ww3 is not the solution.