this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40038 readers
2076 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

EU industry chief Stéphane Séjourné warned Donald Trump that Europe cannot meet increased NATO defense spending targets, potentially exceeding 3% of GDP, if a trade war ensues.

Trump has long pushed NATO allies to contribute more, recently suggesting a steep 5% target, which many, including Germany and Italy, deem unrealistic.

Séjourné emphasized that national budgets strained by trade conflicts would hinder defense investments.

Trump’s protectionist measures, including potential universal tariffs and criticism of EU trade practices, further complicate Europe’s ability to balance defense and economic priorities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Spend more on defense. Meet your obligations to the alliance or I wont help you"

"But we need trade with you to reach that obligation, Tariffs will only move the goalpoasts further"

"not my fucking problem.... hey, here's a thought, you give us the territory and resources, formally, and then we'll take care of it, then it wont be your problem"

these are not serious people.