Linux

49154 readers

566 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

A noticeable difference in kernels? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have the following kernels installed:

linux-zen (Zen)
linux-rt (RealTime)
linux-hardened (Security Hardened)
linux-lts (Long Term Support)
linux-tr-lts (Realtime LTS)

When I boot up, I try the different kernels from time to time just to see if anything interesting happens. It never does.

My question: How do I actually physically notice the difference between these kernels? If I use RT, does Firefox spawn quicker (in my testing, no, not really)?

What are some use cases when I can really see the difference in these kernels?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've definitely had Windows hard lock before and stop responding to the keyboard, from Win95 all the way to Win10. I have no experience with Win11 so I can't speak for that, but all others have situations where it can happen.

In fact, Windows is bad enough that the disk usage being high can cause the system to stop responding until it's done and drops back down.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can jam the Windows UI by spawning loads of processes with equivalent or higher priority to explorer.exe, which runs the desktop as they'll compete for CPU time. The same will happen if you do the equivalent under Linux. However if you have one process that does lots of small allocations, under Windows, once the memory and page file are exhausted, eventually an allocation will fail, and if the application's not set up to handle that, it'll die and you'll have free memory again. Doing the same under every desktop Linux distro I've tried (which have mostly been Ubuntu-based, so others may handle it better) will just freeze the whole machine. I don't know the details, but I'd guess it's that the process gets suspended until its request can be fulfilled, so as long as there's memory, it gets it eventually, but it never gets told to stop or murdered, so there's no memory for things like the desktop environment to use.

[–] nyan 2 points 1 day ago

On Linux, the OOM reaper should come for the memory cannibal eventually, but it can take quite a while. Certainly it's unlikely to be quick enough to avoid the desktop going unresponsive for a while. And it may take out a couple of other processes first, since it takes out the process holding the most memory rather than the one that's trying to allocate, if I recall correctly.