this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
335 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60584 readers
3386 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 126 points 2 days ago (28 children)

There's a big problem with the "women message first" gimmick, and it's that they just don't.

If they don't simply let the match expire, you either get a shitty Gif, or something along the lines of "hey."

Maybe one in ten will actually send a message that genuinely starts a conversation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

That ratio was much higher for me. I'd say about 70% sent a message. Probably work on the profile, make it more interesting? If that is now really gone I'm not sure whether I ever install that App anymore, it was nice not having to come up with first messages with questionable outcome...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Maybe it's you guys, but I never really had this issue.

[–] [email protected] 121 points 2 days ago (4 children)

it would work better if it was "women swipe first'. men can look at and swipe the women who swiped them already. this solves two problems:

  1. women are not seen by anyone they don't want to be
  2. men don't need to spend hours swiping hundreds of women

please give me 1 million dollars

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

That's the premium feature in pretty much every dating app. You get to see who likes you but you have to pay the money to find out if anyone swiped on you at all.

They imply that lots of people swiped on you but you don't actually know until after you've given the money.

So basically your plan is to just remove the con part which I'm all in favor of.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Facebook dating kinda has this where you get notified if someone likes you Ironically it works better than any other dating app. The whole swipe til you both match deal is just to keep people paying and using the app for longer

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (11 children)

This means men will see many fewer women on the platform in many cases.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

it means men would not spend hours on the app, which means nobody would ever do this

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who wants men spending hours on the app and why? Most of these are subscription-based, not ad-supported.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Sure, but you've got to build that habit of checking the app. Gotta lure people back for more little hits of dopamine. The men aren't going to subscribe (or at least stay subscribed) if they aren't getting that illusion of lots of options for people to date.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Exactly, Im 50 and Im not rich or particularly good looking. If I was straight I might only see 5 or 6 women on the app that would match with me to begin with and if those didn't become anything I'd be done with that app. It can't work

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Would you rather see 5 or 6 women that all expressed interest in you or a thousand women who have never and probably will never even see you? Open the app, swipe 5 or 6 times, move on with your life.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As someone who has spent a stupid amount of time browsing Tinder for shits & giggles, I'm not sure I wouldn't want that. But then again I'm gay and things work way differently for us. If I swipe right, it's very likely we match and then have a boring convo that goes nowhere. Maybe I suck at it but I never have any luck despite everything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

You're gonna have a boring convo on a chat app with a random stranger. You're both interested in each other, just ask to meet up. Do something interesting together and the conversation will flow naturally.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

i am the most attractive sexy man in my entire giant city of 23 million people but i still have to swipe 50 girls to get 1 match and i might not even be that interested in her. better to meet girls in real life and follow them around on the tube and insert myself into their personal space 🚀

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you either get a shitty Gif, or something along the lines of "hey."

So same result as when men message first.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Might just be my experience, but men put in more effort. Probably because women are more desirable so they don't really need to.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 128 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I literally saw so many profiles being like “I don’t message first”, like do you even understand what the app you’ve signed up for is?

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago

I always wondered if they realised we actually can't send the first message.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, men CAN message first, as of like 8 months ago.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Great, so I can just use any other dating app now, and don't need Bumble anymore? What kind of genius move it is to kill the signature feature. But oh well the person responsible already left...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I loved bumble when I was on it 🤷‍♂️ much, much higher hit rate than any other app

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I have by far more luck getting matches on tinder

load more comments (22 replies)