SneerClub

1015 readers

12 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

did scoot at one time have the mask on, cos if so that must be the distant past (awful.systems)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

How To Stop Worrying And Learn To Love Lynn's National IQ Estimates

Isn't It Super-Racist To Say That People In Sub-Saharan African Countries Have IQs Equivalent To Intellectually Disabled People?

No. In fact, it would be super-racist not to say this!

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/how-to-stop-worrying-and-learn-to

archive: https://archive.ph/BJ6bd

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the followup

One possible answer is that the causal pathway is high GDP → lots of education → lots of practice with abstract reasoning → high abstract/symbolic IQ. I don’t think this can be the whole story, because some countries that “cheated” to get high GDP (eg oil sheikhdoms) can’t translate it into IQ points at the same rate as everyone else. I’m stuck with the boring basic explanation that maybe you need to do a lot of abstract reasoning tasks to get high GDP.

You can't possibly be this dumb. Tfw you're so blinded by racism you transfer yourself to the platonic realm where numbers are things in themselves.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Also in the comments to the followup you've got people debating whether believing that there are genetic differences between races constitutes scientific racism.

Steve Sailer doesn't think so. To which Philip replies

The point isn’t that what you’re saying isn’t true, that point is that for most people who have heard of Steve Sailer, Steve Sailer is the textbook example of a scientific racist. So I think we have a good working definition of scientific racism, which is just, whatever Steve Sailer says. I say this unironically with no disrespect; I also consider myself a scientific racist.

TGGP asks

Who doesn't think there are genetic differences between the races?

gottem