this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

Hackaday

515 readers
54 users here now

Fresh hacks every day

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

So besides the fact that it’s too high of impedance, can’t carry enough voltage for broadcasting any signals, requires dedicated custom amplifiers, and costs more… Sure.

[–] Galapagon 1 points 1 day ago

Do you have an alternate suggestion? I've got vhf/uhf in the attic, but only Ethernet in the walls to my desired destination from the coax demarc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

It only seems practical for certain receive antennas that already require an impedance matching transformer.

For most uses, RG-6 would be a better choice if you want cheap transmission line. It can easily handle 100 watts as long as you don't use F connectors. For a single band antenna, the coax can be cut to a multiple of a half wavelength and there will be no impedance matching required if the antenna is 50Ω.