this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
317 points (93.4% liked)

2meirl4meirl

1102 readers
524 users here now

Memes that are too meirl for /c/meirl.

Rules:

  1. Respect the community. If you're not into self-deprecating/dark/suicidal humor then this place isn't for you. Kindly just block and move on. This is just how some of us cope.

  2. Respect one another.

  3. All titles must begin with 2meirl4meirl. This is for multiple reasons. One is just so you can be lazy with titles but another is so people who aren't into this kind of humor can avoid it.

  4. Otherwise just the general no bigotry, no dickishness, no spam, no malice, etc stuff.

Sidebar will be updated when I feel like and considering I'm Sadboi extraordinaire we'll see when that will be.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So 50 is, superwhore?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Id imagine there's a few zeros dragging the average down.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Well there are also a few who are way above the average dragging it back up again. We need to see a distribution curve

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is still a bit misleading visually, because the population numbers for the bars are totalled, not distributed among the partner counts within each category. Eg. each partner count within the 2-10 partner bar has an average of ~5% of the population, which is less than the 0-partner bar, but they add up to ~45%, more than the 1-partner bar.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Red line appears to be total by specific percentage (maybe smoothed?)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh yeah, true! Although that reveals that we're missing fine-grained data above 0 and 1, so even with smoothing it's not very detailed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Perfect! Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

For every person who fucked 30 people, you need 6 people who never had sex to bring the average back to 5. I find 5 to be impossibly low, even as someone who's number is 5.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Eyy... How you doin', eh?

(Sorry. "Beacon" and "distribution curve"? I couldn't not.)

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I’m a picky slut and only have had seven sexual partners. One of them had over 50, though.

So there’s at least 55 people with no partners we’re making up for

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I had 30 that I can actually remember when I count them out. And can only remember the names of 15 of them. So am I down right slut or is this not correct. Maybe it counting woman. Most women I met or been with numbers was in the low tens or single digit numbers. It's always men who I heard have huge numbers.

Then again some may lie. Once met a 22 year old who claimed he slept with 300 women. I didn't by that shit at all. At 22 I been with only 4. I didn't really start getting laid a lot until I discovered online dating. The amount of hookups through that app is off the charts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Men and women have hooked up with the same number of men and women. Just how the math works out. 1 dude sleeps with 5 different women, means 5 women all added 1 to their number.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Except that people can be gay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yea, that's why I specifically didn't mention that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok but choosing not to mention that doesn't mean that you don't have to account for it. It just means you're being wrong on purpose

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's over complicating my point when it isn't necessary at the time. I don't know the numbers, but most people aren't having sex with both genders. So yes, there will be variance, but on the whole the numbers will be equal.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

You can't know that with your logic though. You're just assuming that's true

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Guess I'm a whore too, if that is true. I in the mid tens with sex partners. I thought I was on the low end. Is this a legit statistic?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Shame shame shame! Shame you couldn't bang more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Been a wonderful committed relationship for over 11 years going on 12. I call her my wife and I am happy. I am her first and so glad she forgives me for all the banging I did before I met her.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yikes I never met a guy so happy to tell me he married a 12 year old.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What!? No she 38 we been together 11 years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh I thought you were married 11 years since she was 12 yo!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

40 to 60 sex partners is way above average by every statistic I've ever seen

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wait, they're shaking the data tables now, too?