I skimmed, but I disagree wholeheartedly with the notion of any anti-war message that discourages support in and for Ukraine without putting at least that much emphasis in the need for Russian soldiers to get out of Ukraine (its borders restored, including Crimea, with tangible guarantees secured against further Russian aggression) and stay out. Anything less than that undermines the argument as being one of 'class solidarity' against a ruling elite conducting conscription, but rather one of people willing to sell out their country just to save their own skins.

Reading the piece more than I did at first, it reads extremely much like a pro-Russia propaganda piece, in terms of framing the Ukrainian government as an 'authoritarian militarist country', a notion that is laughable when you not only compare Ukraine to Russia, but also consider that it is Russia that invaded Ukraine, after having already illegally annexed Crimea, not the other way around. Realize that Russia's territorial aspirations do not end with what they've seized so far, and 'pacifism' will just lead to another "peace in our time".

Furthermore, framing NATO as part of the problem, rather than an inevitable safety net against Russian aggression, is parroting the false narrative the Russian government spun as an excuse to invade Ukraine in the first place.