this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
503 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

60359 readers
4665 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brown567 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like it is still censorship, but a degree of censorship required for public safety is tolerable...

Unless he's saying that social media sites policing content on their platform isn't censorship, because it's not. It's only censorship if it's a government doing it, you have the right to control what is said on a platform you own

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It's only censorship if it's a government doing it

The amount of public space, both real and virtual, is decreasing dramatically. I think limits on private censorship should definitely exist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Alright, so just for example let's say I spin up a Lemmy instance on my computer and allow other people to make accounts on it. Why should the state be able to require me to store anything I don't want on my PC?

Or do these limits only kick in for platforms above a certain size? And in that case, why would the same principle not apply?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Or do these limits only kick in for platforms above a certain size?

That's how it's in the EU, the DSA only applies to large providers. It's kinda like the fairness doctrine in broadcasting but in the digital domain, e.g. TikTok is currently in hot waters over the Romania elections because they did not take sufficient precautions to make sure that everything's fair and square.

And in that case, why would the same principle not apply?

Because size obliges. If I want to smelt some cans in my backyard I can just do that provided I have a "fireplace" -- which is just an area set up to be suitable to have a fire. If I want to build an industrial-scale aluminium smelter I have to get permits and everything. The public interest in the latter is much larger, that's why I have to jump through hoops and follow regulations.

(I can't burn garden waste though, gotta give it to the municipality to compost. A matter of waste of perfectly fine organic material and unnecessary emissions).

[–] brown567 3 points 4 hours ago

Excellent point