this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
231 points (83.9% liked)

Technology

60271 readers
3415 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not my title! I do think we are being listened to. And location tracked. And it's being passed on to advertisers. Is it apple though? Probably not is my take away from this article, but I don't trust plenty of others, and apple still does

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure Apple just paid 95 mil because they were bored.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That Siri was bugged in a way that activated it unintentionally, which then sends recordings to Apple, is not in dispute. Turning that into "they're always recording your conversations" is a big leap. Why would the whistleblower that revealed the recordings being misused not bother mentioning that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was activated at times in which it was unintentional and then they sold that data.

People are saying, and I have observed, extreme coincidences with the ads were timely, They were on novel data that wasn't thrown through searches, and they weren't explainable by locality.

You don't have to be recording 24x7 to get they observed outcome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have any proof they sold that data? I'd love to know why the plaintiffs settled out of court if they thought they could prove Apple is feeding every voice recording into their ads. They had to pay 5x as much just for slowing down old iPhones, actively selling voice recordings would undoubtedly be worth far more than that.

The issue is that contractors had access to the recordings, which is certainly a breach of privacy, but not a grand conspiracy to target ads.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not going to play move the goal posts with you all day long.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

At what point did I move the goalposts? I never denied that the recordings existed. I simply fail to see how someone at Apple would decide that selling private conversations is worth the insane risk.