Technology

60306 readers

4045 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Is it possible to design a social media app or service that rather than focuses on farming engagement, it tries to promote quality content? (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 55 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Define quality.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm trying to build such a thing as well, but it always comes down to this. Options:

users self-moderate - they'll work themselves into echo chambers
community moderators - will likely create echo chambers
corporate moderators - motivated by money, so expect ads and probably echo chambers

I think the first is the best option, so I'm looking at algorithmic solutions based on user behavior, but it's likely to end up in the same spot.

[–] taladar 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think you are not seeing the whole scope of the problem. Echo chambers are only one of the problems, lowest common denominator posts are another issue of self-moderation/voting.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's why there needs to be a difference between agree/disagree and relevant/spam. I'm planning to have both, and hopefully people use them to good effect.

[–] taladar 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am not even necessarily talking about relevant/spam. Some content might just naturally lose out because e.g. an interesting mathematical proof has less mass appeal than a cute cat picture even though the former might be higher quality and effort.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 2 points 2 days ago

Sure, not all content is relevant to all people. That's why Lemmy organizes things into communities, and self moderation can also differ by community. A good resource on experimental math may not be as good of a resource on cute cat pics.