this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
114 points (97.5% liked)
RetroGaming
19892 readers
323 users here now
Vintage gaming community.
Rules:
- Be kind.
- No spam or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I haven't ever heard anyone say Sonic 1-3 are bad so this is in the clear.
"Official Sonic games" run the gamut from Sonic 2 to Sonic Boom/'06. It's kind of the poster child for a franchise that is an unstoppable media juggernaut that has beloved all-time classic games... and some absolute garbage games.
Yeah but if you watch the trailer its clearly homage to the 2D games. So we can kind of judge quality on that, which flash game developers mastered long ago.
Edit: also Sonic 1, 2, 3 & Knuckles are masterpieces so Idk about this gamut talk including those.
Even limited to 2D Sonics, there are official Sega products that are just terrible. Remember Sonic 4?
It's still a tolerable playthrough, especially with part 2 in the mix.
And honestly, people get stuck talking about 1-3 as if they had stopped making 2D Sonic games until 4, but the Nintendo portable games are mostly some shade of solid, with maybe a couple of exceptions.
Thats a 2010 game and itself a simulacrum of the classic Sonic era. That was also 2.5D and not 2D, which already breaks from what we see in this post.
I will say it, Sonic 1 is bad. Going fast is actually never the answer in that game somehow. Maybe I just suck. 2 and 3 are obviously great.
There was a period in there where people got into the idea that "it was never good" and made the case for 1-3 as a bit of a contrarian take.
Got way less defensible in the context of Generations, Mania and Frontiers getting a bit of a franchise revival going, but it was a thing for a while.