politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Interested to see how people can be against this but for race based affirmative action, where the admissions are even more swayed in favour of the people with lower scores and qualifications getting in.
As an Australian I find the whole US college system just insane. Here if you get the marks you get in to University. There’s no writing essays and doing interviews and padding out a high school resume. It’s based on merits, as it should be.
Then there’s the whole fraternity thing too, but that’s another story for another day.
I'd find that easy:
the rich have plenty of material advantages and don't need more.
The point of race-based affirmative action in the USA is that we have evidence systemic disadvantages for certain races, so those could be systemically 'balanced' with affirmative action ('balanced' in quotes because all of these things are band-aids at some level).
And certainly you will agree that ONLY the rich having advantages is the worst of all worlds, as it will continue to concentrate wealth in few hands and destabilize society.
I agree that the US college system is insane in general. We should probably start regarding them as nothing more than overpriced branded buildings, because they are not going to reform themselves and indeed they probably always functioned as rubber-stamp factories for the rich. They don't know how to change now.