Came out pretty good. Generated at 2048x1024 then upscaled 2x in img2img. No Refiner.
`cinematic photo breathtaking High Quality, Award Winning, photorealistic, realistic, photograph, landscape of a Overwrought Seductive The Nidhogg Dragon from inside of a Savanna, Hazy conditions, 50s Art, Alabaster lighting, film grain, Canon EF, Circular polarizer, Kodachrome, matte, subsurface scattering, radiosity, studio quality . award-winning, professional, highly detailed . 35mm photograph, film, bokeh, professional, 4k, highly detailed
(low quality:1.4), ugly, deformed, noisy, blurry, distorted, grainy, drawing, painting, crayon, sketch, graphite, impressionist, noisy, blurry, soft, deformed, ugly
Steps: 20, Sampler: DPM2 Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 1207805303, Size: 2048x1024, Model hash: 31e35c80fc, Model: sd_xl_base_1.0, Variation seed: 3557558652, Variation seed strength: 1, Clip skip: 2, Token merging ratio: 0.1, NGMS: 0.4, Version: v1.5.0`
I remember once reading a book about dragons when I was little. It tried to explain “scientifically” on how they would exist if they were real.
The excuse for the wings was that dragons were actually full of gas when they flew, making them light enough to use those little wings. Breathing fire was a way to expel gas and control their altitude.
I always liked the idea of dragons just being big balloons :)
That's still bullshit. Assuming it's methane, ~~the gas is 1.1kg/m3. Where air is 1.2kg/m3.~~ You will need a really big volume of methane, like a Zeppelin or an hot air balloon.
the audacity to call dragons being big balloons a bullshit idea 🤣
Those quotes were there for a reason :)
Maybe I’m reading it wrong, but according to this, methane is 0.668 kg/m3?
If I remember correctly, the author was hypothesizing that dragons would create hydrogen from water somehow. That would put it at 0.0899 kg/m3. Would that make it more feasible?
You are right I had the numbers wrong.
Zepelins were still really big to lift the people. Maybe if the dragon has no meat but just skin.
🤣