this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
44 points (69.6% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2566 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Only reason it comes off negative is because she’s a woman. If this were trump people would say “wow what a great business man”

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cutting a meeting short by 20 minutes, only taking 3/17 questions and telling them to "get onboard"? No, that's presumptive and disrespectful regardless of who does it.

And sheer idiocy on her part.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Most politicians do that especially if you know they won’t endorse you or vote for you and the only ones that get shit on are dems. Another example of dems need to be perfect

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you want Dems to be judged on the same standards as the Republicans? Guess we gotta start excusing any Dems that do crimes because we can't have them be the only one to get shit on.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Wow bro way to completely blow that out of proportion

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You've got a real "just a prank, bro" style of dialogue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Nice little ad hominem to finish off the conversation, I say bro one time and you base this entire comment off that 👍

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

It comes off as negative because it's consistent with Democrats' withering contempt for people who work for a living.