Not The Onion

12558 readers

450 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

498

Classified fighter jet specs leaked on War Thunder forums – again (ukdefencejournal.org.uk)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

WW2 makes it incredibly unlikely

But, fun fact, Wikipedia and other public websites totally CAN (unknowingly) have sensitive material on them. In large part because saying "Hey. We need you to remove that snippet that said the Asgard landed in Toronto, hitch hiked to Dallas, and blapped JFK" because... it confirms that that is "close enough" to real that it has revealed classified information.

I am not familiar with this specific event. But I can also see that as just being a catch all policy they have regarding sources to have fewer cases of governments calling them and asking them to remove "something" with the only info being "You know what it is".

Its also why a lot of the "War Thunder or whatever has classified information leaks again!" are usually actually more just export control violations (... which are actually MUCH scarier but...).