this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
-4 points (33.3% liked)
College Football
861 readers
1 users here now
A community to discuss college football.
Check out our other sports communities!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I expected them to use better judgement in including at large teams. Swapping Indiana or SMU for Alabama/Ole Miss/South Carolina would have been better games. Putting Boise State and Arizona State in the first round and giving Texas and Ohio State byes would have better first and second rounds.
6/8 teams playing this week likely had no shot at winning the whole thing anyway, but we could have at least had some more competitive games.
Sec teams? Like Tennessee that got absolutely rocked by OSU?
It's a super weak argument. Only Sec homers think their conference is the end all, be all. We need less sec favoritism, not more.
Indiana did well- ND was just better. You could put any of those teams you mentioned and they get the same result, if not worse for having to play in the cold.
I'm not even an SEC fan, I just recognize there's a very real difference in depth there vs the Big10. OSU is the second best Big10 team, it's not surprising they can beat an SEC team (especially after that embarrassing loss to Michigan). I doubt Penn State or Indiana could have. Maybe the cold really is a major factor, but I think the bigger issue is teams being inflated by soft schedules.