this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
150 points (98.1% liked)

Ukraine

8367 readers
469 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You do realize no country is going to give up their best military secrets?

WTF are you talking about? Ukraine needed artillery shells and missles. Planes. None of this shit is "secret"

The restrictions were in no way arbitrary

Biden doing it now clearly shows that they were.

You are not providing a rebuttal to my thesis here but merely execusing poor performance with corruption is normal and Putin got nukes lol

Aka US didn't care for Ukraine to win, the goal is to weakem Russia so US provided just enough aid to Ukraine to do this while Ukraine lost initiative so it is now forced to negotiate on US terms.

None of this is to excuse EU behavior as it is their war and we keep 40k troops in Germany alone to defend it against Russia lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, and they were given artillery shells. They were also initially given short-range missiles to limit the range of attacks so Russia couldn't claim we were arming Ukraine for an all-out attack on Russia. And then as more information came in about the state of Russia's military, better missiles were supplied.

The whole point of this was to prevent provoking Russia into a full nuclear launch. It's only been two years, did you seriously forget the concerns with the US getting involved at all? Russia claimed to have the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons in the world, and there wasn't much solid information to contradict that claim. It sounds to me like you think everyone should have risked a global nuclear meltdown against a small man who acted like he was the toughest kid on the block, rather than playing it safe in case he really did have all those nukes ready to launch. Sure, NOW we know better, but in February of 2022 there was still a reason to believe he had the capacity, and we certainly know Putin is mad enough to have pulled the trigger.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You keep repeating these talking points like a broken record.

Biden admin policy was either a failure or intentionally idiotic.

Sullivan fuckef up. Cope.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Talking points... Sure. As if I'm some kind of mouth piece for the current administration. God forbid somebody should have individual common sense opinions about the things that are happening in the world. Maybe come back when you've grown up enough to actually understand the diplomatic necessity of what I'm talking about, because it seems like your whole viewpoint is "throw caution to the wind and burn down the world".