this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
1332 points (98.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

6024 readers
2169 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Things didn't end well for the last guy...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

BTW, it's around 13.5 percent but regardless it's not 80% (that's a lie)

Sure, if you only measure after 6 weeks.

For women of reproductive age, losses between implantation and clinical recognition are approximately 10–25%. Loss from implantation to birth is approximately one third [39, 46, 48, 49].

A recent re-analysis [39] of data from three studies [46, 48, 49] concluded that, in normal healthy women, 10–40% is a plausible range for pre-implantation embryo loss and overall pregnancy loss from fertilisation to birth is approximately 40–60%.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5443340/