this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
43 points (97.8% liked)

Transgender

184 readers
38 users here now

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] allo 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"The bill now heads to President Joe Biden’s desk, where he must decide whether to sign it into law or issue a veto. While Biden has previously pledged to veto anti-trans legislation, rejecting the NDAA would risk jeopardizing military funding for 2025, a move with uncertain and potentially far-reaching consequences."

I personally consider biden justa politician like the others and 99% sure he won't veto cuz that would 'mess up the system' too much... But I would instantly change my view of him and be the biggest biden fangirl complete with UwU Biden Plushies if he veto'd and simultaneously pwned both the antitrans attempt AND military spending with single veto.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Joe Biden is morally obligated to veto this bill.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Except that this wouldn't pwn military spending at all, it just puts it into Trump's hands instead

[–] allo 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

ewww. so what's the outcome where we win then?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Uhh... Time travel? We already lost tbh. We just gotta get some wins in the future where we can

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

That's the fun part...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

The one where people show up and vote for down-ballot progressive candidates years ago, and against Republicans in November, instead of shoving their heads up their asses. Looks like we might be a little late for that.