this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

354 readers
211 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Nov. 15, U.S. District Judge Sean D. Jordan of the Eastern District of Texas ruled that the Labor Department had exceeded its authority in issuing the overtime rule, finding fault with the new salary threshold, which he said was too high, and with the automatic updating.

Given the millions of workers and the large variety of employers who would be impacted by the rule, he wrote that it would be impractical, if not impossible to tailor it in a way that would be acceptable. So he tossed the rule in its entirety. SpaceX and Amazon are among the companies that have filed lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Board. Business Accused of violating worker rights, SpaceX and Amazon go after labor board

A week later, Ohio State delivered the bad news. In emails sent late on a Friday afternoon, the 306 employees who had just gotten raises were informed that "as a result of the reversal in the law, you will no longer receive an increase in your base pay."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Calling it “the Biden overtime rule” is kind of misleading. The rule was always there: they just tried to change the threshold, plus automatically adjust for inflation

Here’s the thing:

  • article points out 2004, and the threshold was about median wage
  • Obama attempted to increase but was rejected by court
  • Trump increasing by a smaller amount
  • Biden attempted to increase but was rejected

Aside from the seeming partisanship in the court, an increase

  • was accepted when set to about median wage
  • rejected when set noticeably above median wage.

While I agree it’s set way too low and needs to be raised, it’s quite plausible the court decided that too much above median wage is a difference in kind, that should be set by Congress. Maybe if we had a functional Congress …..