this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
222 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2466 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump, who has pledged to crack down on immigration, continues to hire foreign guest workers for his businesses at record levels.

In 2024, Trump’s companies, including Mar-a-Lago, his golf courses, and a Virginia winery, hired 209 foreign workers, nearly double the number from a decade ago.

Most were employed under H-2B visas, meant for seasonal jobs when American workers are unavailable.

Critics argue these programs undermine U.S. workers’ bargaining power, while Trump’s allies, like Project 2025, advocate for restricting such visas. Trump has distanced himself from these proposals while continuing to utilize the program.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They literally ran on "Mass Deportation". Not "targeted deportation". Not "deport the criminals". It was "MASS Deportation". They made how many millions of those signs? They literally plastered it everywhere. When someone tells you what they are going to do, believe them. Cheap labor is a minor hiccup they will give up to fuel their deep seated racism. If they cared about costs they wouldn't impose tariffs. They don't care.

I can't believe you guys are jumping through hoops and grasping at straws to think they won't do what they literally said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not that they don't want to today. It's that the logistics of deporting millions of people is a lot more than they realize.

They'll get started, all gung ho, realize they've bit off more than they can chew, notice that the oppression has made it so that the cost of undocumented labor goes down (because what are they gonna do, complain?), and then slow the roll of disappearing people to a manageable level while still keeping the remainder well oppressed.

The tariffs just work another side of that equation. Tariffs raise prices on manufactured goods across the board, for foreign and domestic products, because if you're a domestic manufacturer of widgets, all you have to do is set the price of your widget just under the price of foreign widgets.

Put some cheap labor on top of that, your labor expense goes down, and you get more profit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It’s that the logistics of deporting millions of people is a lot more than they realize.

I believe I already covered this when I said "As for the exact number, it depends on the courts blocking things, the basic logistics of getting enough ICE ..."

That's the only limiting factor.

realize they’ve bit off more than they can chew,

This is where we disagree. They may be forced to be slow, but they will go hard and try to get around the obstacles.

The tariffs just work another

Sigh, I brought up tariffs because people keep saying (essentially) "they can't deport that many people, our economy depends on it". Well guess what the economy depends on trade and they don't care, they will put in tariffs. Just like they don't care about the hit to the economy from deporting people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you're not going to care about what I actually said, then I see no reason to continue this discussion. I explicitly told you that I think they're going to deport a lot of people. You know... En masse?

Have fun arguing with yourself.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You said deportation is not the point, and I discussed how deportation is literally the whole point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm amazed at how skeptical you are that elites use reactionary resentment to enrich themselves as matter of course.

And you're calling everyone else naïve.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They can enrich themselves pretty damn well without needing to rely on illegal immigrants. Trump will use them if he can, but he wants them out even more. That's the difference.

The real enrichment will come from union busting, destroying the NLRB, FTC, FCC, FDA, etc, deregulation, privatization of government departments (postal service, NASA), sweetheart court decisions, tax cuts, capital gains tax cuts, etc, which they will go full ham on. Illegal immigrant wages are next to nothing.