this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
972 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

11399 readers
444 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
972
nuclear (mander.xyz)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Only alternatives that I'm aware of:

  • solar cells (converting photon energy into electricity)
  • acid batteries (converting chemical energy into electricity)
  • peltier devices (converting heat differential energy into electricity)
  • induction (converting electrical energy into electricity on a different circuit)
  • bioelectricity (using biochemical energy to produce electricity)
  • static buildup (using friction between various materials to produce a voltage differential)

I think there's a way to use lasers to generate electricity, too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Piezo converting pressure or vibration to electricity

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I think it's note-worthy that while the list is long, only 3 of them are practical to supply/regulate electricity on a large/industrial scale: solar, spinny things, and acid batteries.

We use all three of them in today's and in the future's electricity network.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Producing acid batteries, or any batteries isn't power generation. It's turning chemical potential (which was generally produced in an energy-consuming process) into a storage device for electrical potential.

Induction is just changing the properties of your electricity, not generation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are all just ways of converting energy from one form into electricity. Every single one of the ways we "generate" electricity ultimately comes from gravitational energy. By the time we use it to power electrical circuits, it all has gone through various energy-consuming/losing processes.

The list wasn't so much a "ways to create electric energy that aren't spinning turbines" as a "power sources for electric circuits that aren't spinning turbines", which is why I included chemical and electrical, even though they often aren't very useful without another source of electric power.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Fair enough. As you said, none of these are net producers of electricity if your thermodynamic system is big enough to count as closed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I think there’s a way to use lasers to generate electricity, too.

i've read some really cursed direct photonic conversion theory from nuclear energy. It's uh, novel. Definitely a pipe dream though.