this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
366 points (98.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2003 readers
1359 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That depends entirely on the mathematical ratio between the handout, the wealth level of the received and the potential costs and losses they may face.

I find myself reasonably well off some would consider me wealthy and i don't have 100K sitting around, That would still be life changing money to me.

Someone who has a single million is insanely wealthy to me. That is a fuck you amount that no one should just have… But if you look at the price for lawyers in high profile homocide cases these can easily go up into multiples millions, suddenly that insane wealth is zero + debt, do they still not need handouts?

This doesn’t justify wealth it points to another breach on the wall. Legal defense is a system in favor for the ultra wealthy, the most money wins so usually state and corporations. Our guy is a shrimp.