this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
119 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

134 readers
82 users here now

The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.

You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Related

Rules

While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.

Rules

  1. Always be civil and respectful
    Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity.

  2. Don't be a bigot
    No form of bigotry will be tolerated.

  3. Don't post security compromising suggestions
    If you do, include an obvious and clear warning.

  4. Don't post conspiracy theories
    Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources.

  5. Don't accuse others of shilling
    Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate.

  6. Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
    Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Did they think nobody would notice?

Very unlikely, they're doing it openly and they know from experience that all changes are always immediately reported in the community. They operate this way by choice.

Are they going back to the bad old habit of removing features just for the sake of removing features?

Doubt it, DNT is not only useless it is misleading as the user may think it is effective while in reality it allows "better" fingerprinting.

Did the fact that so many of their users have that flag set interfere with their ad tracking ambitions?

Source? I thought reports had usually been that it saw extremely low adoption on the client but maybe I'm wrong. Best rates I could find was <9% on desktop and 19% on mobile but that's back when it was most talked about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

If "do not track" was already in use by 10-20% of Firefox users a year after it became available, at a guess I'd say maybe it got to at least 20-30% over time, considering how popular the idea became in the years following that. But let me know if you find actual data I guess, that might be interesting.

At any rate, having to refrain from tracking ad attribution by default for even just 10% of users would be a substantial cost in the future where that system becomes a big source of revenue.

I'm not saying that's their motivation, just that it seems roughly plausible that it might be, in the absence of a better explanation.