this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
9 points (90.9% liked)

Politics

373 readers
195 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Tuesday, both a federal district court in Oregon and a state court in Washington blocked the $24.6 billion deal, saying it would reduce competition, which would harm shoppers.

By Wednesday morning, Albertsons abandoned the merger and filed a lawsuit against Kroger, alleging a willful breach of contract for not doing enough to win regulatory approval for the merger. Kroger, in a statement in response, said Albertsons is deflecting its own responsibility.

The two are likely headed for a new bitter legal fight with money at stake. Albertsons is seeking "billions of dollars" in damages for lost shareholder value, legal costs and time in limbo. It also wants the $600 million merger break-up fee, to which Kroger says Albertsons is "not entitled."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So they couldn't merge and raise prices, so they're gonna sue each other and raise prices anyway to cover these legal fees?

[–] pelespirit 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They're trying to not let the other succeed maybe? Very strange take on their part.