this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
318 points (89.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9817 readers
38 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Whether you like it or not, our modern society can't function without cars entirely, we still need delivery vehicles etc. Focusing on the fact this vessel dares to carry cars, rather than the fact the fire was able to spread between presumably multiple decks, and cause the entire cargo to burn.

Sprinkler systems on vessels is very much a thing.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nobody here wants everything with rubber wheels banned. We just want cars to be a form of personal transport to be the lowest prioritized compared to other forms like buses, trains, etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey it looks like your comment got quadruple posted. Do you happen to use liftoff for lemmy? I do and multiposting happens to me occasionally.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wefwef/liftoff actually! Kept getting errors and refreshing didn't show anything. Thanks for the heads up

[–] Sethayy -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

imagine a nationalized train system where you essentially own and park your own traincar. shit could be so efficient you could replace power lines and roads with one

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That just sounds like cars with extra steps.

[–] Sethayy 2 points 1 year ago

I mean like minus the massive inneficiency of small scale combustion engines, plus it takes away all but production pollution (rubber from the tiresz exhaust, literally anything in a car that spills out)

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we only had cars where they are needed, for emergency and delivery vehicles etc, then the demand for these sorts of things would reduce massively and the likelihood of something like this happening would plummet.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah but then rich people will have to ride public transit together with the poors. Obviously we can't have that

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good luck fighting a burning EV with sprinklers!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The aim of a sprinkler system is to contain a fire, not necessarily to extinguish it. A sprinkler system can, will, and has kept a burning EV from spreading to other vehicles.

Now, gasoline on the other hand, that floats on water, which is very annoying to put out.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

good luck doing it with a burning gas powered car!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuel and other hydrocarbons float on water, which makes them very difficult to extinguish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

and a burning car is a whole lot of burning material

it's not a tiny piece of wood - in many cases you'll detect it first, when there's actually a whole lot and flames/smoke escaping from the car.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

can’t function without cars entirely, we still need delivery vehicles etc.

yeah, okay. But we need far fewer than we have. So producing them and shipping them around the globe needs to be reduced dramatically. So that point still kinda stands?

And yes "this should have been made safer" is another point - but that doesnt invalidate the other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So producing them and shipping them around the globe needs to be reduced dramatically. So that point still kinda stands?

The supply side is the wrong place to tackle this problem though. If you limit the amount of new cars that may be produced, people will simply drive their older ones for longer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Driving an older car, and by extension not buying a newer car, decreases demand and would improve the amount of these cargo ships on the sea, thus lowering the opportunity for this to happen. I’m not sure if your comment was for or against people driving their older cars, but I think driving an older car is better than upgrading and buying a newer car

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

An older more polluting car migth not be the better option. But if the new car is one of those giant murde boxes then it's not going to be an upgrade either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no infastructure needs to change. less roads more rails that simple. walkable cities and transit in between cities

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

totally correct

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nobody here wants everything with rubber wheels banned. We just want cars to be a form of personal transport to be the lowest prioritized compared to other forms like buses, trains, etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nobody here wants everything with rubber wheels banned. We just want cars to be a form of personal transport to be the lowest prioritized compared to other forms like buses, trains, etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nobody here wants everything with rubber wheels banned. We just want cars to be a form of personal transport to be the lowest prioritized compared to other forms like buses, trains, etc.