this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
133 points (97.8% liked)

Technik

384 readers
65 users here now

die Community für alles, was man als Technik beschreiben kann

Beiträge auf Deutsch oder Englisch

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are they also involved in more accidents, or is it a smaller proportion of accidents but they’re deadlier?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The research into Tesla’s safety issues is ongoing and doesn’t paint a particularly coherent picture. Indeed, a similarly publicized report published in August by vehicle history information vendor EpicVIN claimed that, of all the car brands, Tesla drivers were least likely to suffer fatal injuries. If both that report and the iSeeCars report are to be believed, it would imply that Teslas drivers are most likely to be involved in fatal crashes but least likely to be killed in those crashes.

I have highlighted the relevant sentece, it is a little bit confusing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not really. It's stating that Tesla accidents kill more people, just not the drivers of the Tesla.

Unrelated factoid: Tesla drivers are the highest demographic to self identify as not having survivor's guilt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

These accident rates are normalized to billion miles driven. So long roadtrip highway miles vs city commute is going to be a major bias in these numbers. My take is that Tesla is fairly unique in that their models are heavily concentrated as a commuter car in dense urban areas, whereas other brands have more general use.