this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
207 points (94.4% liked)

Firefox

18037 readers
293 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They support Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, HuggingChat, and Mistral.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Thing is, for your average user with no GPU and whp never thinks about RAM, running a local LLM is intimidating. But it shouldn't be. Any system with an integrated GPU, and the more RAM the better, can run simple models locally.

The not so dirty secret is that ChatGPT 3 vs 4 isn't that big a difference, and neither are leaps and bounds ahead of the publically available models for about 99% of tasks. For that 1% people will ooh and aah over it, but 99% of use cases are only seeing marginal gains on 4o.

And the simplified models that run "only" 95% as well? They can use 90% fewer resources give pretty much identical answers outside of hyperspecific use cases.

Running a a "smol" model as some are called, gets you all the bang for none of the buck, and your data stays on your system and never leaves.

I've been yelling from the rooftops to some stupid corporate types that once the model is trained, it's trained. Unless you are training models yourself, there is no need for the massive AI clusters, just for the model. Run it local on your hardware at a fraction of the cost.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can you point me to some resources to running smol llm?

My use case prob just to help "typing" miscellaneous idea I have or check for my grammatical error, in english.

Thanks, in advance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Idk I noticed pretty significant differences between models of various sizes. I mean there are lots of metrics on this

https://www.vellum.ai/llm-leaderboard

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Last time I tried using a local llm (about a year ago) it generated only a couple words per second and the answers were barely relevant. Also I don't see how a local llm can fulfill the glorified search engine role that people use llms for.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Try again. Simplified models take the large ones and pare them down in terms of memory requirements, and can be run off the CPU even. The "smol" model I mentioned is real, and hyperfast.

Llama 3.2 is pretty solid as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

These are the answers they gave the first time.

Qwencoder is persistent after 6 rerolls.

Anyways, how do I make these use my gpu? ollama logs say the model will fit into vram / offloaing all layers but gpu usage doesn't change and cpu gets the load. And regardless of the model size vram usage never changes and ram only goes up by couple hundred megabytes. Any advice? (Linux / Nvidia) Edit: it didn't have cuda enabled apparently, fixed now

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Nice.

Yea I don't trust any AI models for facts, period. They all just lie. Confidently. The smol model there at least tried and got it right at first... Before confusing the sentence context.

Qwen is a good model too. But if you wanted something to run home automation or do text summaroes, smol is solid enough. I'm using CPU so it's good enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

They're fast and high quality now. ChatGPT is the best, but local llms are great, even with 10gb of vram.