this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
509 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

6016 readers
3600 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Once again an article missusing the word supervulcano. This time, already failing the to tell, what they actually are.

For those interested, a vulcano is considered as a supervulcano, when it had an erruption with a vulcanic explosivity indwx of 8 at least once (meaning releasing at least 1000 cubic kilometer of vulcanic materials). There are no known supervulcanos in Italy

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This one had at least one eruption with a force of 7. Give it time, there are no supervolcano calderas in Italy, so far.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlegraean_Fields

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

At least found a source there telling, that it has the potential for doing a VEI 8 eruption (Still doesn't make it a SV now). Though they are generally way more concerned about the local poplulation when smaller eruptions happen.

Dunno, I just get easily irritated by the sensationalism of supervulcanoes. A vulcano does not need to be "super" to pose great threats