this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)

Canada

7380 readers
1050 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The part that makes it feel like vote buying is the income limit they set. A person making $140k getting $250 doesn’t change their life or relationship with groceries and rising costs. Why not make the cap lower and give the lower income individuals more to make an actual difference in their lives? Because then it’s not vote buying.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I believe they said that even families with $140k income are struggling. Believe that if you want, but they aren't just sending out checks to people who wouldn't benefit from it.

But I get your point. It impact lower-income families far more than someone making 2-3 times more.

[–] assaultpotato 4 points 2 months ago

A family of 4 on 140k combined income would indeed be kind of tight, especially depending on where.