Privacy

32169 readers

426 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What are some controversial privacy topics? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

72 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If you don't know me, I make frequent write ups about privacy and security. I've covered some controversial topics in the past, such as whether or not Chromium is more secure than Firefox. Well, I will try my hand again at taking a look at some controversial topics.

I need ideas, though. So far, I would like to cover the controversy about Brave, controversy around Monero and other cryptocurrencies, and controversy around AI. These will be far easier to research and manage than Chromium vs. Firefox, for example. I'd like to know which ideas you have!

Which controversial privacy topics do you know of that you would like to see covered?

PLEASE DO NOT ARGUE ABOUT THEM IN THE COMMENTS!

Please save any debate for if/when I make a write up about the topic. Keep the comments clean, and simply upvote ideas you would like to see covered. I won't be able to cover everything, so it helps bring attention!

Above all else, be kind, even if you don't agree with an idea or topic :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There is no expectation of privacy in public.

By which I mean that things like blurring a house from Street View are unreasonable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/09/you-really-do-have-some-expectation-privacy-public

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, there's a reason I added that clarifying second sentence. To be a little more nuanced (but still overly simplistic because I don't feel like writing an enormous essay right now), I would say you don't have any expectation of privacy by default in public, but that anything that might reasonably amount to stalking because it's targeted tracking of an individual, even if it involves footage of someone in public, is certainly not ok.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago

Nuclear war should do the trick at re-establishing this kind of privacy.

Hell, is other people

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

IMO, blurring a house in Street View could lead to the Streisand effect, especially when 99% of all other property is unblurred.

If you want to remain private, in the case of Street View, your best bet is to keep it as inconspicuous as possible, otherwise people will start looking closer and ask questions; the exact opposite of what you want, even if you have nothing to hide.