this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
371 points (91.1% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

733 readers
485 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] catsarebadpeople 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pointing out a basic fact is not pedantry. I am definitely pedantic, but this isn't an example of it.

[–] catsarebadpeople 1 points 17 hours ago

You might want to look up the definition of pedantic. Pointing out and drawing attention to the fact that Buddha isn't a god figure for some Buddhists, while technically correct, has nothing to do with the point this post is trying to make. Furthermore, even though Buddha might not be seen as a literal god, his teachings are still the basis for the religion. So his likeness is still an appropriate addition to the image posted.

Your basic fact is useless information and it's by definition pedantic. Seriously, just look up the definition. I don't know if I've ever used it more appropriately.