268
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
268 points (98.9% liked)
politics
19118 readers
2804 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Honestly writing articles like this, “someone will consider….” Should be license to have your ability to read and write beaten out of you.
Shut the fuck up
Report on things that are happening
They are meeting to decide whether or not to release the report. This is quite literally something that is happening.
They won’t.
I wouldn't be surprised if they don't, but I'm not as confident as you are, as the committee is split 5/5 and there are republicans calling for its release. Additionally, we're two years out from any election, so they have a bit more freedom to act on their conscience rather than just bow before Trump.
However, none of this changes the fact that this article is about them meeting to discuss whether to release it. Something that is happening.
This was pretty much assumed to be dead in the water after Gaetz resigned. It could have been, but the fact that the Republican-majority house committee isn't 100% jumping at the opportunity to sweep things under the rug is a thing that's happening. Maybe it won't go all the way, but they are discussing. That's a thing that's happening.
Now, if it were one of those "(person) should do something" or "(committee) could do this thing that's in their power on paper but totally in the author's imagination in practice" things, sure. But you've got people talking about releasing a report on someone arguably not in their jurisdiction. That's something.