this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
252 points (93.8% liked)

AssholeDesign

7645 readers
5 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This image is not mine, it's from u/Andireas_Germany on Reddit

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There is a lower price tier of Youtube premium being tested in Europe right now that has ads, but still gives offline viewing and youtube music. This is what that is for. People who are seeing ads know exactly why they are seeing ads; because they signed up for a plan with ads. The regular plan at the regular price is still ad free.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think you're mistaken about what this lower price tier offers. It is still ad-free, except for Youtube Music which is ad-supported. If a regular YouTube video uses a song that belongs to the YouTube Music catalog, it will have ads as normal. Also, this tier doesn't offer background playback (with the phone screen turned off).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/17/24272930/youtube-cheaper-premium-lite-subscription-limited-ads

has more info and explains, ads are expected.

It's stupid to pay and still get ads, but that is how it's presented.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You are correct, maybe? I say maybe because I see now the original info that I was reading was speculation from last month, however, new information is sparse and every site seems to contradict the others. Honestly, now I don't know what they are doing with it. Regardless, it is a separate tier of a plan, so those that are seeing ads signed up for a plan that includes ads in some form or another. It's not like Google just started sneaking ads into the full premium tier without warning, which what this post and the others like it that I've seen are rage baiting for.

[–] tja 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So it seems they are only expecting ads in YouTube music, so I understand when they are then confused to see ads in their YouTube videos

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It possibly highlights a problem that I've always had with youtube music. Anyone can label their video as "music" and it will show up in youtube music. The biggest offender are rip off artists that name themselves after existing bands and then upload "new" tracks designed to get people to give their fake band the views that the real band is getting. Then, presumably, they take their ad revenue and peace out. It bothers me, because I'll look up an artist and there will be some crazy ass Middle Eastern band putting out new "Black Sabbath" songs, polluting the artist page with bullshit. It's even worse when one of the tracks shows up in a radio station. Google really needs to separate music and video.

[–] tja 0 points 1 month ago

Oh that's how it works? Good to know! 🤔

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The literal opposite of what people¹ want then. Give me back the €5 no ads, no yt music and no off app viewing and I will consider enabling the app and remove the YouTube adblockers in my browser.

¹ People as in me. I am at least one people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

If the cheap options suck, people might end up buying the more expensive one. At least that’s what Google hopes you will do.