this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1679 points (98.1% liked)

The Onion

4584 readers
984 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, it they still don’t want the status quo, so they would not have been happy either way. The point is that the party proposing a change can scoop up votes of those wishing for change, which is most people.

Biden didn’t win on no change. He won on change from trumps presidency. Change wins. Proposals win. Stability is good, but if people don’t feel stability, like with runaway inflation, or a recent global pandemic, or a recent trump presidency, then saying things are stable and good is not a winner. They are not.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The point is that the party proposing a change can scoop up votes of those wishing for change, which is most people.

Shouldn't we blame voters for not looking at what change is being proposed?

Oh wait, many of them were being told she's worse than Trump, going to start the next world war, jail white men, or other such nonsense on social media or podcasts.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

All of that's true, but not how the general voting population works. We have to live in the world that exists, not the one where everyone is paying as much attention as they should.

Alternatively, this should be massive fucking sign that the general voting populace is so desperate for any change that they'd go for horrible changes rather than perpetuating the status quo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There is enough blame to go around. However, voters as a bloc is a more nebulous concept than a voter or party.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

People voting is an essential part of democracy. If people don't understand it, if they failed to understand what was at stake, or if they undertood it but still didn't vote against him then they're fucking morons.

We can talk about mistakes of DNC, Biden, Harris, Pelosi etc for all eternity but that doesn't change the fact that the American voters are morons.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If the American voter is a moron, as you proposed, then is the smarter party the one that treats them like a moron, yet gets elected. Or the party that says they are not, treats them like an educated adult but loses elections to someone like Trump. Multiple times. While calling those that vote for him garbage. Well, garbage fought back and kicked them out. Now Trump will kick them while they are down but blame immigrants and the deep state.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

By that logic the scammers preying on the gullible are smarter than the people running homeless shelters and soup kitchen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

In a capitalism hellscaoe, you're not far off. However a soup kitchens purpose is to feed people. A scammers purpose is to scam.

A political partys purpose is to get their members elected and pass legislation together. An individual politician can have similar but different purposes, but the parties purpose is clear. In this case, unlike the soup kitchen, the Dems are failing in their purpose.