this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
563 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9808 readers
360 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The new law permits pedestrians to cross a roadway at any point, including outside of a crosswalk. It also allows for crossing against traffic signals and specifically states that doing so is no longer a violation of the city’s administrative code. But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way and that they should yield to other traffic that has the right of way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What, wait, no. I've lived in very rural areas, wtf was I supposed to do without a car? Bike back and forth a few hours for groceries?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

There will always be edge cases. The trick is that your scenario ought to be an edge case rather than the most common case.

Some one is free to search actual numbers but in the US something like

  • 50% of the population is urban

  • 75% of the population is suburban or urban

For sure different transit or walking options are better for different scenarios but most people, including in the US, are in places where buses or trains can be useful

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't live in rural areas. Those should be wildlife habitats, tbh.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So people should only live in dense, crowded cities? Because even in the suburbs it's not possible to grocery shop without a car.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Suburbs can ultimately be redesigned (and I'd argue they should, for a number of reasons)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah but until then a man's gotta eat lol and I don't see them putting grocery stores every 2 miles any time soon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Given most grocery stores compete more than anything on location, that does surprise me, but you're not wrong.