this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
48 points (98.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5158 readers
578 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
48
Russia’s Warming Arctic Is a Climate Threat. War Has Shut Scientists Out of It. (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Climate science has been stymied as Russia continues its war in Ukraine. The stalled work threatens to leave the West without a clear picture of how fast the Earth is heating up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humblebun 1 points 1 day ago

Western nations aren't funding people to work in Russia.

They are. VoA and Red Cross do function there. Alongside with a thousand of commercial organizations like Manpower and Unilever

Russia requires people who live there and accept funding from overseas to register as foreign agents

Yes and no. Currently, the government can pronounce anyone a foreign agent stating that they are under foreign influence. Money is not the source of this status anymore.

Foreign research initiatives in Russia used to work a little bit different to what you have probably used to. There were, effectively two ways:

  1. Foreign organizations grant Russian scientists money for research, but the money is transferred to the Russian government, and the government gives it to the scientists in a year.

  2. A foreign organization and a Russian both give a grant to a cross-national group. The foreign one transfers money to the foreign part of the group and the Russian one transfers to the Russian.

Both these ways seem to work right now, so the claim in the article looks suspicious to me.