this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
431 points (98.6% liked)

HistoryPorn

4904 readers
280 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another angle:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

either that or they don't make jet fuel like they used to

in before "um, actually, the B-25 was a propeller-driven aircraft and therefore obviously did not use jet fuel"

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

I mean that and a b25 weighs like 40k lbs and a 767 weighs like 400k lbs, and flies twice as fast.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Very very different crashes.

The planes that hit the twin towers were bigger, going faster, and had more fuel.

The twin towers themselves were also built with a different skyscraper design at well that used fewer steel beams. I don't remember what the names of the skyscraper design types were but I remember a 9-11 history channel program going into it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I may be wrong but I recall the twin towers had a central spine that was the load bearing component like a tree or something. Older buildings had a frame and load bearing exterior with a soft, gooey center.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I remember it being explained as the twin towers "hung" somehow, so the central spine makes sense.

The older buildings were basically just steel beams like you see in cartoons. Lots and lots and lots of steel basically in cubes from what I recall. So there was just a lot more to catch the load. In some sense they were overbuilt.

[–] DudeImMacGyver 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Jet fuel can't melt steel memes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DudeImMacGyver 2 points 1 month ago

I heard they made hypnotoad gay!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

but the resulting fire can absolutely diminish their load capacity, making them frail and pliable like boiled spaghetti

[–] DudeImMacGyver 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Perhaps counter-intuitively, if your pockets are full of Mom's spaghetti, you're more likely to be structurally sound.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Either that, or Bush did 9/11

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe a B-25 killed WTC 7