this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
53 points (96.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43623 readers
1147 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lot of the things we do on a daily or weekly basis have ways of doing them that can either be private or communal, some of these which we do not think to consider as having that characteristic.

For example, bathing in the Roman Empire used to be communal, but then Rome fell and citizens in the splinter countries began taking baths privately.

Receiving mail is another example. There are countries which don't have mailboxes and everyone gets their mail at the post office in the PO boxes. It was the United States which pioneered the idea of the modern mail system, which is why we associate it as a private act.

There are activities as well which don't have any history as jumping between one or the other that might benefit from it, for example I think towns might benefit if internet was free and freely accessible but only at the local library.

What's a non-communal aspect of life you think should be communal?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Child-rearing! Child-rearing! Child-rearing! I hate the nuclear family model!!

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I've been seeing that shift a lot recently. For instance, a lot of friends will work out a deal where their kids spend the day with their grandparents once or twice a week to save on day care costs.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Nono I mean a full-on third, fourth etc. parent. Someone who takes care of the child basically from birth, who is as trusted as "mom" or "dad". Maybe even a second person responsible for breastfeeding the child.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

I dunno about that one, chief... I don't trust people to not be weirdos or to be properly housebroken anymore. Certainly not westerners-- I'd have to do a full-on, US Government style background check on a mf before I was comfortable putting my child in another person's hands.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

I don't want to be a full time parent, but I'd happily teach an inquisitve kid the few things I know for a few hours a week