This plant of a friend seems to only produce calyxes. Is this a genetic thing or could it also be due to some kind of stress? If it is because of genetics, do you think this could be worth saving by taking a cutting?
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)
Trees
6666 readers
46 users here now
A community centered around cannabis.
In the spirit of making Trees a welcoming and uplifting place for everyone, please follow our Commandments.
- Be Cool.
- I'm not kidding. Be nice to each other.
- Avoid low-effort posts
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They use the same term for entire growth process dude….
The call it a flower, because a flower includes the calyx, like explained by my multiple images.
Not once does your link show any part of the flower as a bract, it’s always underneath the flowers.
I didn’t leave anything out, it’s an image. I come choose any from any part of the growth, and they all show the same part of branch being the bract. Which isn’t related to flowers.
A solitary flower should have a bract itself…? No? Because how can it exist if you’re saying the outside is the bract…? Your article literally shows the opposite of what you’ve claimed in your original image…. This is how stupid the argument is. It’s not a bract….
I love how you can’t provide anything that says a bract is part of the flower (other than the whole incorrect thing) or what the calyx is. And everything you’ve provided has said something different… pick one dude and stick with it.
I just proved you wrong with your own gotcha example and additional literature, but yeah, this is the nature of the calyx/bract argument.
The additional stuff says different than your other two sources…? Sure that proves me wrong? and what gotcha example?
Your paper shows a bract under the flower structure itself, like my image. So how does that make the outer flower coating a bract…? Please explain with your own words instead of copying pasting others.
Because it seriously looks like you’re just regurgitating information without understanding it. Every source you’ve provided has said and shown something different dude…
Again, no argument, just someone being wrong. It’s like when a flat earther tries to “explain” or argue their side. Sure you can call it what you want, but you’re still never going to be correct…
Man, I'd swear that's the definition of an argument!
Well, this has been an excellent argument. Thank you for the time!