Wikipedia

1590 readers

232 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Only links to Wikipedia permitted
Please stick to the format "Article Title (other descriptive text/editorialization)"
Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails

Recommended:

If possible, when submitting please delete the "m." from "en.m.wikipedia.org". This will ensure people clicking from desktop will get the full Wikipedia website.
Interested users can find add-ons and scripts which do this automatically.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Cryptozoology (en.wikipedia.org)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by merde to c/[email protected]

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Cryptozoology is a pseudoscience and subculture that searches for and studies unknown, legendary, or extinct animals whose present existence is disputed or unsubstantiated, particularly those popular in folklore, such as Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, Yeti, the chupacabra, the Jersey Devil, or the Mokele-mbembe. Cryptozoologists refer to these entities as cryptids, a term coined by the subculture. Because it does not follow the scientific method, cryptozoology is considered a pseudoscience by mainstream science: it is neither a branch of zoology nor of folklore studies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Varyk -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"You are failing the very basics of reading comprehension here."

this doesn't make any sense with respect to my comments. what do you mean?

oh, here's why:

"I can't even figure out what the hell you're talking about."

yeah, you being confused doesn't mean other people are confused.

You are confused

"As I've said repeatedly, real zoologists discover and document new species."

oh, like cryptozoologists have.

got it.

Now you're taking up the mantle of my argument.

"You're completely dismissing the work of naturalists, biologists, and the occasional trophy hunter, and instead crediting a concept that wouldn't exist for half a century. "

by agreeing with your point that zoologists and cryptozoologists discover animals?

The development of a concise term for someone studying mythical animals doesn't mean nobody studied and discovered mythical animals before then because they found evidence of their existence.

lasers were invented the '60s, they didn't get named lasers until the '70s.

didn't mean lasers weren't real until they came up with a good name.

at best, you're arguing that all cryptozoologists are legitimate zoologists since they discover new animals.

"I'm not gonna keep banging my head against this wall."

If that's what you've been doing, your goofy mental gymnastics so far make much more sense in context.